ControlUp does allow for scheduled exports of monitoring data to the file system, and these exported files can be consumed by a trending analysis component. They do – but it is in a completely different manner. That’s not to say that these capabilities don’t exist in the product. ControlUp does not use a database to store historical metrics, nor is this information stored out “in the cloud.” This design decision is a double-edged sword – it makes it very easy to set up a monitoring environment, but viewing historical data and trending based on past usage aren’t integrated into the product in the same way that they are in other monitoring platforms. One component that you will notice is missing from the ControlUp requirements list is a database of any sort. ControlUp also has a watchdog service that can be installed on a server that will collect metrics and handle alerting should all running instances of a console be closed.
Display master 4 windows#
It was originally designed to monitor RDSH and XenApp environments, and over the years it has been extended to include generic Windows servers, vSphere, and now Horizon View.ĬontrolUp is an agent-based monitoring system for Windows, and the agent is an extremely lightweight application that can be installed permanently as a Windows Service or be configured to be uninstalled when an admin user closes the administrative console. I can see where my trouble spots are and how it contributes to the overall health of the system it is running on.ĬontrolUp is a monitoring and management platform designed primarily for multi-user environments. So why make the comparison to the Master Systems Display from Star Trek? If you look in the screenshot above, not only do I see my ESXi host stats, but I can quickly see that host’s VMs on the same screen. Servers that can’t run the agent won’t pull all stats. The Stress Level column and color-coding of potential problems make it easy to identify trouble spots. The ControlUp Management Console showing a host in my home lab with all VMs on that host. Although it doesn’t provide a graphical map of where my systems might be residing, it provides a nice, easy to read list of my systems and a grid with their current status, a number of important metrics that are monitored, and the ability to dive down deeper to view child items such as virtual machines in a cluster or running processes on a Windows OS. PHP Weathermap is FOSS example of a product in this space.ĬontrolUp 4.1 is the latest version of a similar tool in the systems management space. They can give a nice graphical layout of the network, and they can show how heavily a link is being utilized by changing the color based on bandwidth utilization. Some tools with these functions already exist in the network space. And this information needs to be displayed in a way that makes it easy to understand while providing administrators with a way to dig deeper if they need to. This is especially true in a multi-user or multi-tenant environment where you need to quickly identify the systems and/or processes that are not performing optimally. Linked from Memory Alpha.Īlthough the Master Systems Display is fictional, the idea of having one place to look to get the current status of all your systems can be very appealing. The Master Systems display from Star Trek Voyager. This large display, which was found on the ship’s bridge in later series, contained a cutaway of the ship that showed a detailed overview of the operational status of the ship’s various systems. One thing I have always liked about the Engineering section from Star Trek: The Next Generation was the Master Systems Display.
0 kommentar(er)
